Jump to content

Education/Case Studies/fivecriteria/ja

From Outreach Wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Education/Case Studies/fivecriteria and the translation is 33% complete.


5本の柱




Rochelle Davis
Assistant Professor of Anthropology
ジョージタウン大学
アメリカ合衆国


コース名
Introduction to the Study of the Arab World
Theorizing Culture and Politics

コースレベル(学部/学科)
M.A. and 2nd/3rd year undergraduates

学習目標
ライティングスキルの向上    
メディアと情報リテラシー  

Critical Thinking and Research Skills

   

Collaboration


Wiki Technical and Communication Skills

  



Discipline of course


多学科

クラスサイズ
20

Individual or group assignment


個人

リソース
Theorizing Culture and Politics syllabus
Theorizing Culture and Politics Wikipedia assignment
Theorizing Culture and Politics final assignment

評価

学生は学期のためのテーマを選び、研究し、ウィキペディアにエントリーを寄与し、同じテーマに関する研究論文を書きました。

They also wrote five blog entries about their experiences over the course of the term.

I graded the assignment based on five criteria:

  1. Vision for the entry content: Did you divide up the material in a way that reflects both the literature and neutral point of view? Did you make the appropriate headings?
  2. Your research in thinking-beyond-Google to find relevant and diverse sources.
  3. Your organization of the entry and the content: Did you organize the material or are there things in one section that belong elsewhere? Did you provide relevant material? Are there things missing?
  4. Your writing of a well-supported, well-researched entry: Neutral point of view? Sources/footnotes? Grammatically correct? Paragraphs well-constructed?
  5. How you address the comments you were given by me and others.


(CC-0) by Justin Secor