Education/Case Studies/fivecriteria/zh

From Outreach Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Education/Case Studies/fivecriteria and the translation is 5% complete.


Five criteria




Rochelle Davis
Assistant Professor of Anthropology
Georgetown University
美国


課程名稱
Introduction to the Study of the Arab World
Theorizing Culture and Politics

開課對象(大學生/研究生)
M.A. and 2nd/3rd year undergraduates

學習目標
寫作技能發展    
媒體與資訊識讀  
批判思考與研究技能    
合作
維基技術與溝通技能   

課程領域
Multidisciplinary

學生人數
20

個人或團體作業
Individual

資源
Theorizing Culture and Politics syllabus
Theorizing Culture and Politics Wikipedia assignment
Theorizing Culture and Politics final assignment

評分

Students chose a topic for the semester, researched it, contributed an entry to Wikipedia, and then wrote a research paper on the same subject.

They also wrote five blog entries about their experiences over the course of the term.

I graded the assignment based on five criteria:

  1. Vision for the entry content: Did you divide up the material in a way that reflects both the literature and neutral point of view? Did you make the appropriate headings?
  2. Your research in thinking-beyond-Google to find relevant and diverse sources.
  3. Your organization of the entry and the content: Did you organize the material or are there things in one section that belong elsewhere? Did you provide relevant material? Are there things missing?
  4. Your writing of a well-supported, well-researched entry: Neutral point of view? Sources/footnotes? Grammatically correct? Paragraphs well-constructed?
  5. How you address the comments you were given by me and others.


(CC-0) by Justin Secor